Did bookies understand the results for the referendum https://real-money-casino.club/slots-of-vegas-online-casino/ that is scottish advance, while polls were way off the mark? It sure looks that way.

Scotland has voted in which to stay the UK, with 55.3 per cent of voters deciding against dissolving the 300-year union of nations and going it alone. Many were surprised that the margin between winning and losing votes was as wide as ten percent; lots of polls had predicted that the result was too close to phone and that the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ campaigns were split straight down the middle.

The fact remains, polls were all around the place: contradictory and fluctuating wildly. They ranged from the lead that is six-point the ‘yes’ vote up to a seven point lead for the ‘no’ vote in the weeks leading up to your referendum. And they considerably underestimated the margin of the ‘No’ victory although they were correctly predicting a ‘no’ vote on the eve of the big day.

Margins of mistake

Not the bookies, though. It was had by them all figured down ages ago. As the pollsters’ predictions had been see-sawing, online sports betting outfit Betfair had already decided to spend bettors who had their funds on a’no’ vote a few times ahead of the referendum even occurred. And even though there was a whiff of a PR stunt about this announcement, it was made fro […]

The Iowa Supreme Court has ruled that the casino that is local not need to pay a $41.7 million jackpot to one of its customers adhering to a slot machine malfunction.

Instead, 90-year-old grandmother Pauline Mckee, of Antioch, must be pleased with the $1.85 payout that the machine might have granted had it been functioning correctly.

McKee was playing the Miss Kitty cent video slot during the Isle Casino Hotel in Waterloo, where she was a guest during a 2011 family reunion, when she believed she’d hit the big one.

Because the reels came to rest, the language ‘$41,797,550 bonus prize’ flashed up on the display screen.

But the casino refused to cover up, pointing down that the machine had a maximum payout of simply $10,000.

Instead, she was paid the $1.85 she had actually won from the spin, as well as the $18.10 in credit remaining in the machine, while the device itself was sent away for separate technical analysis.

Tests revealed that the device’s computer had mistakenly determined it possessed a bonus award.

Malfunction Voids All Pays

McKee sued for breach of contract and consumer fraud, a filing that ended up being dismissed in 2013 by a region court judge. This the Supreme Court upheld that ruling, noting that an indication on […]